Michael Geisterfer for Chelsea, Quebec Ward 6 councillor
Michael Geisterfer
Welcome to the blog page for Michael Geisterfer.
The Low Down has invited him to post his campaign platform, ideas, and any other information about the candidate here. We also invite comments from the public in the comments section at the bottom of this page.
One week to go…..
No phone number.
No e-mail address.
Obviously not to interested in what his constituents have to say.
Mr. Geisterpher must think people are stupid.
If he gets elected……I guess they are.
Thank you for your comment. It clearly demonstrates a point I have been trying to make about the inherently nasty tone of preservation Chelsea. I’m not sure why you care about getting ahold of me since you wouldn’t vote for me if I was the only person on earth to vote for.
And it’s GeisterFER.
Thanks Ryan. Good luck with Geoff Bleich’s campaign.
1. As recent tenants with no long term commitment to the neighbourhood do you believe the Chelsea Foundation should have voted or abstained in the Chelsea Creek referendum?
2. Only 27% of eligible voters said yes to the Meredith Center borrowing by-law . D’apres vous, est-ce que c’est un bon dette or a bad debt?
Personally, I think Mr. Geisterfer’s idea to run a near zero-carbon footprint campaign innovative. I wish I’d thought of it first…alas, I had to sacrifice a few treelings, otherwise I’d just be a copy-cat. And publishing your phone number would certainly not merit the label of “not caring what your constituents have to say.”
And finally (you can check this up with any political aide) calling electors stupid is know as a “gaffe”, a “faux pas”, a “mis-speak”. If you do represent a candidate, I would hope he’s working on a spin-control plan because that’s really a bad thing to say in public, in the middle of a campaign. If you need a good media consultant, I can refer you to someone.
I’d hoped to get this posted at the top of my page, but that doesn’t seem to be happening. Here’s a bit about me:
The first thing I like to tell people about myself is that I am a fiscal conservative. It’s true. In 2000 I ran as a candidate for the Canadian Alliance in Hull-Aylmer. I lost, badly, but I learned a lot about myself. On the Conservative spectrum I am apparently what is called a civil libertarian. I believe in small government, low taxes and manageable debt. I have strong opinions about things like gay marriage (I’m for it) and abortion (I’m pro-choice, but anti-abortion) so I am not really a social conservative.
From my perspective, the role of government is to manage change and conflict, and to provide guidance and regulation where necessary. There will always be a multitude of views in Chelsea, and they will not all get their way. Politics is the art of compromise, which is one of the few platitudes I will allow myself in this piece. My role as councillor will be to channel the views of my constituents to the council chambers to advise the decision-making process.
Ultimately, it is not so much what I think, as what my constituents think, or at least the majority of them. It’s not always the fairest system, but it is the best we have so far.
Some people are worried about the pace of change in Chelsea. We’ve accumulated too much debt, they say. We should stop everything and catch our breath. I think what we really need is a reality check. While it is true that we had less debt ten years ago, we also had worse roads. What we didn’t pay in interest payments to service the debt, we paid to repair the suspensions on our cars.
We’ve also taken on more responsibility from the provincial government who has been dumping, er…downloading services onto us. We have had to build fire stations and buy fire engines and hire staff, all of which costs money.
Is our debt excessive? No. Should we plunge into more of it? No. Can we reduce it? Maybe, but that requires choices. We all know that we can’t lower taxes and lower the debt at the same time. In fact the two have an inverse relationship: you lower one, the other tends to go up. I don’t want to raise taxes any more than you want to pay them.
Are there services that can be cut? Maybe, and that is one of the things that any council coming in will be taking a look at.
I think it should be fun. I look forward to being your councillor!
{ 9 comments }
Mike,
Je suis résidente du quartier 6 àChelsea. J’aimerais beaucoup avoir des renseignements sur vous et sur votre programme. Je n’ai pas de compte FaceBook ou Twitter. Je suis certaine de ne pas être la seule dans cette situation. On fait quoi pour voir de l’information sur vous?
On peut vous téléphoner?
Merci
Claire,
Merci pour votre commentaire. C’est vrai ce que vous dites, et j’aurais du penser àca. Vous pouvez me telephoner à819-997-9080 pendant la journée et le soir à819-827-6328. Entretemps, je vais essayer d’écrire quelquechose àmettre sur cette mini-blog là.
Mike
One week to go…..
No phone number.
No e-mail address.
Obviously not to interested in what his constituents have to say.
Mr. Geisterpher must think people are stupid.
If he gets elected……I guess they are.
Dear Ryan,
Thank you for your comment. It clearly demonstrates a point I have been trying to make about the inherently nasty tone of preservation Chelsea. I’m not sure why you care about getting ahold of me since you wouldn’t vote for me if I was the only person on earth to vote for.
And it’s GeisterFER.
Thanks Ryan. Good luck with Geoff Bleich’s campaign.
Okay Mike,
I have a couple of questions for you.
1. As recent tenants with no long term commitment to the neighbourhood do you believe the Chelsea Foundation should have voted or abstained in the Chelsea Creek referendum?
2. Only 27% of eligible voters said yes to the Meredith Center borrowing by-law . D’apres vous, est-ce que c’est un bon dette or a bad debt?
Ryan
Ryan,
As I said in my earlier post, good luck with Geoff Bleich’s campaign.
Michael
Ryan,
Personally, I think Mr. Geisterfer’s idea to run a near zero-carbon footprint campaign innovative. I wish I’d thought of it first…alas, I had to sacrifice a few treelings, otherwise I’d just be a copy-cat. And publishing your phone number would certainly not merit the label of “not caring what your constituents have to say.”
And finally (you can check this up with any political aide) calling electors stupid is know as a “gaffe”, a “faux pas”, a “mis-speak”. If you do represent a candidate, I would hope he’s working on a spin-control plan because that’s really a bad thing to say in public, in the middle of a campaign. If you need a good media consultant, I can refer you to someone.
Cheers Ryan,
Edmond
I’d hoped to get this posted at the top of my page, but that doesn’t seem to be happening. Here’s a bit about me:
The first thing I like to tell people about myself is that I am a fiscal conservative. It’s true. In 2000 I ran as a candidate for the Canadian Alliance in Hull-Aylmer. I lost, badly, but I learned a lot about myself. On the Conservative spectrum I am apparently what is called a civil libertarian. I believe in small government, low taxes and manageable debt. I have strong opinions about things like gay marriage (I’m for it) and abortion (I’m pro-choice, but anti-abortion) so I am not really a social conservative.
From my perspective, the role of government is to manage change and conflict, and to provide guidance and regulation where necessary. There will always be a multitude of views in Chelsea, and they will not all get their way. Politics is the art of compromise, which is one of the few platitudes I will allow myself in this piece. My role as councillor will be to channel the views of my constituents to the council chambers to advise the decision-making process.
Ultimately, it is not so much what I think, as what my constituents think, or at least the majority of them. It’s not always the fairest system, but it is the best we have so far.
The role of the municipality is to serve its citizens, not the other way around. Sometimes I feel as if the tail is wagging the dog (that’s a cliché, not a platitude). Dealing with municipal staff can make going to the dentist look like fun. I intend to change that, through the proper channels.
Some people are worried about the pace of change in Chelsea. We’ve accumulated too much debt, they say. We should stop everything and catch our breath. I think what we really need is a reality check. While it is true that we had less debt ten years ago, we also had worse roads. What we didn’t pay in interest payments to service the debt, we paid to repair the suspensions on our cars.
We’ve also taken on more responsibility from the provincial government who has been dumping, er…downloading services onto us. We have had to build fire stations and buy fire engines and hire staff, all of which costs money.
Is our debt excessive? No. Should we plunge into more of it? No. Can we reduce it? Maybe, but that requires choices. We all know that we can’t lower taxes and lower the debt at the same time. In fact the two have an inverse relationship: you lower one, the other tends to go up. I don’t want to raise taxes any more than you want to pay them.
Are there services that can be cut? Maybe, and that is one of the things that any council coming in will be taking a look at.
I think it should be fun. I look forward to being your councillor!
Merci beaucoup. J’apprécie avoir pu vous parler et recevoir l’information aussi rapidement.
Comments on this entry are closed.